Tuesday, October 26, 2010

"AM I NOT A WOMAN AND A SISTER?"



Anti-slavery token 1838









“Am I not a Woman and a Sister?” appeared on abolitionist tokens that were popularly circulated in America and Britain in the 1830s. This particular token is stamped with the year 1838. The widespread image shows an African American woman kneeling in chains with the phrase “Am I not a Woman and a Sister?”. While tokens were a popular choice to exhibit the engraving, this image could also be seen in pamphlets and books, as well as on bracelets, hairpins, brooches and even snuffboxes. They were well known at anti-slavery events and many items were imprinted with the image and motto, and sold at the fund-raising fairs. The endemic slogan originated from an image produced by Josiah Wedgwood; one of an African American man in a similar position, with the phrase “Am I not a Man and a Brother?”. However, the woman’s figure seemed to draw more attention, as well as quite a few important correlations between African American slavery and lack of women’s rights.

This token shows a significant relation between abolition and the fight for equal rights of women. Women took center stage in the abolition movement, and it was during that time that they discovered their own shortage of rights, and began to form an expressive desire for equality. While fighting for the freedom of others, their own inequalities, in striking contrast with those of men, became evidently clear, and the comparisons began. For how could women properly argue for the freedom of others when they were so limited in rights of their own?

Anti-slavery and Women’s Rights crusader, Angelica Grimke, draws comparisons between speaking out regarding the two similar institutions, in a letter written to Theodore Weld ( A Private Debate About Abolition and Women's Rights):




“Now my dear brothers this invasion of our rights was just such an attack upon us, as that made upon Abolitionists generally when they were told a few years ago that they had no right to discuss the subject of Slavery. Did you take no notice of this assertion? Why no! With one heart and one voice you said, We will settle this right before we go one step further. The time to assert a right is the time when that right is denied. We must establish this right for if we do not, it will be impossible for us to go on with the work of Emancipation …”

The points that Angelica Grimke makes are intriguing. She brings to light quite a few interesting correlations. If women had not taken such a large part in the anti-slavery crusade, would they have indeed accomplished equal rights? Without having fought so hard for the African American freedom, would women have took such notice to the chains that bound them? Eric Foner quotes Angelica Grimke (“Give Me Liberty! An American History” pg. 433) as stating, “Since I engaged in the investigation of the rights of the slave… I have necessarily been led to a better understand of my own.”

“Am I not a Woman and a Sister?” did not extend only to female African American slaves, it encompassed the entire spectrum of women in the United States. While the slavery that existed between a white man and his wife was different than the slavery that took place between an African American female slave and her master, both were, nonetheless, mentally and physically abusive. A wife had virtually no rights in her marriage. Her husband was able, by law, to control her; financially, sexually and psychologically. He was her, in the true definition of the word, “master”.

When women came became active in the abolition movement, they found a kindred race. When they asked “Am I not a Woman and a Sister?”, it was an echo of their own feelings, of the disgraceful discrimination that they had suffered for years at the hand of their so-called "brothers". It’s not surprising that women were the most active in anti-slavery affairs; they were fighting not only for the rights of slaves, but for the rights of all humans.








Works Cited


 
Grimke, Angelica. “Angelina Grimké to Theodore Weld and John Greenleaf Whittier.” 1837. A Private Debate About Abolition and Women's Rights.




 
Foner, Eric. "Give Me Liberty! An American History". 2009


 
"Anti-Slavery Token" 1838. Photograph. Anti-Slavery Images, Colonial Williamsburg.


 
"Abolition of the Slave Trade". 2010. The National Archives / Exhibitions & Learning Online

Thursday, September 23, 2010

The Experiences of an Indentured Servant - Richard Frethorne 1623

This letter was written in the year 1623 by Richard Frethorne (link below). Frethorne writes of his experiences as an indentured servant in 15th century Virginia. His letter is written to his “loving and kind mother and father”, and it paints quite a picture of what life might be like for the average indentured servant in the early 1600s Colonial British America.

“…Oh! That they were in England without their limbs and would not care to lose any limb to be in England again…” Frethorne states theatrically part way through his letter. He would give anything, even his own limbs, to back in England, as opposed to in Virginia where, when you are a servant “…there nothing to be gotten here but sickness and death…” He begs his parents openly to send food, as he is starving, and is only being fed “…a mess of water gruel and a mouthful of bread and beef.”

Indentured servitude was a highly popular way for the British to quickly populate and profit from American Colonies. Indentured servants were depicted by the British in a wholly different light than what Frethorne is telling us, which is nothing short of the harshest form of slavery. To the British, and indentured servant was given a free trip to the British American Colonies, and after a short term (5-7 years or so) of servitude, they would be freed, as well as given a sum of money, clothing and land. However, the fact of the matter is that many servants did not even live to see the end of their servitude. According to Frethorne, he believes he may not even live to see a response from his parents he states “…if I die before it come…”. This was not altogether a good thing for the British, as they needed to keep the supply of unpaid workers up, this way their profits from the New World would continue to rise. This letter, informing others of Frethorne’s horrible life in the colonies would most likely not be something the British government would want other’s see, as it might stop others from coming over to America as indentured servants.

Rights for an indentured servant were not clearly written out, and they were beaten, starved and overworked. If a servant made it through the period of indentured service, it was not likely that they would prosper. As you are able to see from Frethorne’s pleading letter, the life an indentured servant was highly unfavorable. Even if Frethorne survives his years as a servant, what kind of life will have afterward? After enduring the horrible treatment, he is bound to be weakened, physically and mentally. From the way he speaks of England, it seems likely that once his years of servitude are over, he will return to England. Which is again, mostly likely, not what the British government would want.

This letter really shows us the beginnings of a country that will soon be completely dependent on forms of brutal and unjust slavery/servitude. Frethorne was living as a servant in the years before the onslaught of the massive influx of African slaves, and gives us an idea of how those without rights are treated. This is letter gives us small look into the beginning of slavery in America from a first hand perspective. It shows us that American was not founded with benevolent laws and freedom for all, but that it was founded with the extreme efforts of those without rights and by the British government. A government that became highly intoxicated by the profit it was gaining from an unpaid labor force. This system of profit bled into American life in the coming centuries, setting a precedence for how much profit can be gained with a minimal effort.










Richard Frethoner
"The Experiences of an Indentured Servant" First Hand Accounts of Virginia, 1575-1705
1623
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/jamestown-browse?id=J1012